Ibn Rushd's philosophy

All philosophers and scientists from the beginning of philosophy and science until today, their opinions about the Creator and the Creator are limited to two opinions: the first; "The existence of a Creator who is free and chosen in his actions. He grants whenever He wishes and withholds whenever He wishes. He has divine providence that manages the world. He is the cause of the forces of nature, meaning that these forces exist in Him, not in them. And the existence of a human soul whose essence is eternal and incorruptible."
The second opinion: "Matter is eternal, that is, it has no beginning. The origin of the universe is through transforming the minutes of this matter with its own power in a way that raises it from one state to a higher state. This requires the existence of a fixed nature, laws and the necessity of existence, a mind upon which laws are built, and the annihilation of man in all." Which was taken from him with the belief in the existence of a Creator, but a vague belief." These are the two parties that disputed and are fighting over science and religion.
It does not need explaining that supporters of all religions are present everywhere, even the pagan religions themselves from the first party, just as it does not need explaining - either - that Aristotle's philosophy is from the second party; Because every page in his books indicates it. He was followed in this by Arab philosophers such as Ibn Sina, Al-Kindi, Al-Farabi, and Ibn Rushd, and they were from the second party.